Skip to content

Shortcuts

  1. Meetings
  2. Bookstore

Subscribe to this Site

What is this?

Join our discussion list

What is "Digest Mode?"
July 2008
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031EC

Pareidolia: Imaginary Significance

May 10th, 2008 by rationalportion

Ever hear of a Rorschach test? Developed by Hermann Rorschach in the 1920’s, the inkblot is a commonly used tool for forensic assessment by Psychologists. While it is commonly thought that a Rorschach analysis is done by interpreting and psychoanalyzing what the patient sees in the inkblot (”Since you saw your dead mother, that means you have unresolved maternal issues”), they are more commonly analyzed with the Exner method: the responses of the patient are compared to a large statistical body of responses and a profile is created based on which personality types most fit the response. (”45% of the people that saw a crow also suffer from clinical depression. 60% of people who saw a bicycle are schizophrenics.” etc.) The interpretation is correlative, rather than directly interpretive.

Rorschach’s function based on some trickery of our brains known as pareidolia.Pareidolia is essentially when we perceive a random or vague visual/audio stimulus as being significant, when in fact it is not.

Some common examples of pareidolia (in addition to rorschach inkblots):

  • Seeing animal shapes in clouds
  • Seeing a “face” on the moon, or on Mars
  • Hearing words or phrase when playing a record backwards (”Saaaatan I lurrrrveyou Sataaaaaan”)
  • Believing that certain religious figures, such as the Virgin Mary or Jesus Christ, have appeared in mundane places (i.e. a piece of toast, a baby’s ultrasound image, in a cloud, on a bloody bandage, etc.)
  • Seeing human-like qualities in natural formations of rock, trees, etc.

You get the idea.

There are a number of ideas about what causes pareidolia. Carl Sagan (the charismatic Cosmologist from PBS’s Nova series) believed that human beings are “hard-wired” to identifying the human face. There are probably some survival implications in an ability like that. It could also simply be that we want to see these things, and so we do.

The variety I always find a bit strange are the religious sightings: when people claim to see the face /body of Jesus or the Virgin Mary in bizarre places. There was one fellow from Ohio that claimed an image of Jesus appeared in his breakfast pancake! Someone else saw Jesus’s face on a piece of toast. A woman named Diana Duyser saw what she believed was the Virgin Mary in a grilled cheese [pictured, left]. (She saved it and ate something else I presume).

What’s peculiar about this is the immediate jump to assuming that the identity behind the face is specifically the face of someone whom the viewer has not only never seen personally, but whose actual appearance was only recorded in text. How do these people know they aren’t actually seeing a bearded man from Salem, Oregon? Or a lady’s face from Sao Paolo, Brazil? If I went through all the trouble to have my face telekinetically projected onto a piece of toast far-far away, I’d be pretty annoyed if someone assumed it was the face of Christ.

Remember the panic of Rock Music back when the Beatles grew their hair long, the Stones were still releasing their records on vinyl (instead of on iTunes), and parents would toss their kids “devil music” into a roaring fireplace? People believed that playing a record backwards (called Backwards Masking) revealed subliminal messages that advocated murder, satan-worshipping, and voting Democrat.

I’ve heard some of these recordings and you have to listen really carefully to even hear something that sounds remotely like spoken English. Nevermind that our human brains aren’t really equipped to decode audio in reverse — so the fact that a hidden message is only noticeable when playing the record backwards is a moot point anyways. Then again, there are some that still believe Subliminal Sleep messages are an effective way of learning.

The bottom line is that we naturally see what we want to see. But just like an optical illusion or a sleight-of-hand magic trick, our mind plays tricks on us.

New Series

May 6th, 2008 by Dave Smith

SERIES PREMIERE!
EVOLVE:
EYES

Eyes are one of evolution’s most useful and prevalent inventions, equipping approximately 95 percent of living species. They exist in many different forms across nature, having evolved convergently across different species. Learn how the ancestors of jellyfish may have been the first to evolve light-sensitive cells. In the pre-Cambrian era, insects, in particular the dragonfly, would take the compound eye to new heights. Find out how dinosaurs adapted their eyes to become such successful hunters of prey. And while dinosaurs remained at the top of the food chain for 150 million years, tiny early mammals developed night vision to populate the night as a survival technique. Finally, learn how primates underwent several adaptations to their eyes to better exploit their new habitat, and how the ability to see colors helped them find food.
(Read More »)

Critical Thinking in a Democracy

April 9th, 2008 by Bob Hertzog

We Americans are blessed in that we are participants in the greatest experiment in democratic living ever to exist on planet earth.  Citizenship in this marvelous venture comes with a cost.  That cost is that we are periodically obligated to take part in our democracy by voting.  Beyond simply voting, however, we have a duty to think critically about the issues on which we vote.  In our world of instant communication, where media are motivated by the bottom line rather than objectivity, and where political candidates are managed by experts with Machiavellian motivations, critical thinking is no easy task.

Critical thinking is the process of analyzing claims while maintaining intellectual humility and fair-mindedness.  This can be done in three steps:

Step one

Make sure the claim is clear and unambiguous.  One of the tricks of propagandists and political persuaders is to design a claim which cannot be pinned down.  When this happens, critical thinkers must determine just what claim is being made.  Exactly what is the candidate claiming?  Without a specific claim, no critical analysis can be made. (Read More »)

Evil Toast!

February 27th, 2008 by Dave Smith

Aaron ToastAfter a joke that went through the list, I decided to have some fun in Photoshop with a picture of a member. Click it to see a larger version. Is it a miracle? No, it’s 10 minutes with a $1200 computer program.

Official Launch Coming Soon!

February 18th, 2008 by rationalportion

The website launch is pending, but will be very soon! We’re currently adding, proofreading, and revising content. Please do not distribute this URL until we officially launch (you’ll know, because this post will be replaced by something to the effect of “Website launched!” :) ). If you are interested in being an editor to help us proofread and whatnot, please comment below and be sure to use an email address where you can be contacted!